THE ISSUE OF PURPOSE
The purpose
of medicine is to restore, maintain or improve the quality of remaining life. It cannot prevent or postpone death because
the lifespan is in the hands of the Creator. The aim of medical education is producing physicians whose practice fulfills
the 5 purposes of the Law. They will have the following characteristics: health and not disease oriented, focused on quality
and not quantity of life, humble to recognize limitations to their abilities, holistic in outlook, understand society, scientific
capability, clinical expertise, and leadership.
THE ISSUE
OF INTEGRATION
A lot
of modern biomedicine is fragmented by organ or disease process and is not holistic. We need to practice holistic medicine
within an integrative paradigm to replace the current world-view that is atomistic, analytic, and not synthetic. Holistic
medicine requires taking into account physical, social, psychological, and spiritual aspects in caring for a patient. This
ensures that an intervention in one aspect does not lead to negative consequences in another aspect of care.
THE ISSUE
OF BALANCE
In the absence of an integrating paradigm, medicine lacks balance and equilibrium in
its therapeutic approach. Extremely aggressive medical interventions may therefore be accompanied by side effects that are
worse than the disease. Some interventions may lead to new illnesses. Balance, moderation, equilibrium, and action-reaction
considerations should underlie medical interventions.
THE ISSUE OF SERVICE
Medicine
should be taught as a social service with the human dimension dominating the biomedical dimension. Medicine should be practiced
as of mutual social support. Medical education should prepare the future physician to provide service to the community. This
will require skills of understanding and responding to community needs that can be acquired by spending part of the training
period in a community setting away from the high technology hospital environment.
THE ISSUE
OF LEADERSHIP
The
medical school curriculum and experience should be a lesson in social responsibility and leadership. The best physician should
be a social activist who goes into society and gives leadership in solving underlying social causes of ill-health. The physician
as a respected opinion leader with close contact with the patients must be a model for others in moral values, attitudes,
akhlaq, and thoughts. He must give leadership in preventing or solving ethical
issues arising out of modern biotechnology. He must understand the medical, legal, and ethical issue involved and explain
them to the patients and their families so that they can form an informed decision. He should also provide leadership in advocating
for the less privileged and advocacy for human rights.